Golos Hardfork / Issues - my stance - (English)

10 месяцев назад
60 в hardfork

Dear Golos community. My name is @roelandp, witness for Golos since day 1 and been supporting the network for over a year, with a witness, seed node and a backup witness, as well as some scripts and the GolosTools.com website.

Last summer I was at GolosFest in Moscow and had a great time spending with the community. Unfortunately my Russian is very rustic and limited to ordering a bottle of Kvass so I totally understand that you would vote for more inclined witnesses like @arcange who in the meantime undoubtly masters russian.

kvass.JPG http://www.redkalinka.com/Russian-Blog/160/_Kvass-the-Communist-Coca-Cola/

I do want to share my point of view, and will do this in English. I have been very busy with the organisation of SteemFest in Lisbon and just returned to Amsterdam. I feel it is very unfortunate to see (from my distant view) the community getting split up about the hardfork and various people staking Golos. My point of view is the following:

  1. I support anyone who supports Golos towards next levels, either by supporting with developers, development.
  2. I think mainly why their are so many "issues" at hand at the moment is that the imminent hardfork has been postponed so often that people are kind-of fed up with this and start getting "rowdy".
  3. I think that much is prevented by having clear communications from the Core Development Team.
  4. Discussions like the Discord yesterday (which I missed) are very functional and so where the 'an Evening with Golos' which happened at the beginning / launch of the network.
  5. Incremental hardforks with focus on 1 or 2 features are a best practice instead of having an ever growing and changing feature set of the "ever"-delayed hardfork.
  6. Working together instead of fighting eachother helps the platform go forward.

I understand these remarks are quite generic, but this is as much as I can go into detail about the matters at hand. I hope that people stick together and work towards one unified product by working together instead of fighting each other. Nonetheless it's good to keep everyone in check, so I think more regular chats / 'a night with Golos' are very welcome, to keep communication and updates clear, as well as discussion / reaching consensus.

I would suggest, let's limit the hardfork features, and get more incremental hardfork's with set feature sets.

Thank you and good night. Всего хорошего,

Ps. we are planning a tour with the trans-mongolian express, if anyone has any tips, when and where to stop, please let me know!

Авторы получают вознаграждение, когда пользователи голосуют за их посты.
Голосующие читатели также получают вознаграждение за свой голос.
Порядок сортировки:  Популярное

Ps. we are planning a tour with the trans-mongolian express, if anyone has any tips, when and where to stop, please let me know!

Our team will be glad to see you on the border of Europe and Asia - in Yekaterinburg

Since 19th of October I don't have any access to Evening with Golos Youtube channel.

But after gathering together in Discord there were a lot of suggestions to make those meetings there regular (although the day when to hold it is still in question).

Also you can watch the meeting, since @vik recorded it: https://golos.io/ru--golos/@vik/zapis-vstrechi-delegatov-i-predstavitelei-kiber-fonda-6-chasov


Yes thx X, i watched it through another recording, hence I am commenting here. I got the link via @arcange.

hi! thx for SteemFest!
Are you going to accept HF?


I am not a big fan of the 'automatic cancelling of witness votes'. Not because of my own position (I think I will drop out of the Top 19 very soon), but because of stability for the network and tiring witnesses & 'regular' users with having to pro-actively ask people again & again to vote for their witnesses. If the HF will move the platform forward, but I would first like to see some results. Also I think it would be best to limit features per HF, whether it is about introducing UIA now and reward curve changes later in future forks. I'd love to see a featureset being 'closed' and moving on the other upgrades of the platform. Especially since the hardfork was already due last summer and then there was not all this discussion about it. Still I am not pro the cancelling of witness votes, but it happens that there is already consensus about that?

Discussions like the Discord yesterday (which I missed)

@roelandp, you MUST see hear it:
the video-archive by the @vik


The meme of the discussions:


Yes as I said above in the reply to @xanoxt, i had "seen" the discord call via via earlier today and hence why I post this.

@roelandp Поздравляю! Вы добились некоторого прогресса на Голосе и были награждены следующими новыми бейджами:

Награда за количество полученных голосов

Вы можете нажать на любой бейдж, чтобы увидеть свою страницу на Доске Почета.
Чтобы увидеть больше информации о Доске Почета, нажмите здесь

Если вы больше не хотите получать уведомления, ответьте на этот комментарий словом стоп

Голосуя за это уведомление, вы помогаете всем пользователям Голоса. Узнайте, как здесь.

Ваш пост поддержали следующие Инвесторы Сообщества "Добрый кит":
spinner, t3ran13, chiliec, eduard, oleg257, zlata777, varvar, lira, on1x, newodin, oksana0407, vika-teplo, talia, mirumir, kito-boy
Поэтому я тоже проголосовал за него!

Узнать подробности о сообществе можно тут:
Разрешите представиться - Кит Добрый
Инструкция по внесению Инвестиционного взноса
Вы тоже можете стать Инвестором и поддержать проект!!!

Если Вы хотите отказаться от поддержки Доброго Кита, то ответьте на этот комментарий командой "!нехочу"

dobryj.kit теперь стал Делегатом! Ваш голос важен для всего сообщества!!!
Поддержите нас:

@roelandp Поздравляю! Вы получили личную награду!

Памятная награда за ГолосФест
Вы можете нажать на бейдж, чтобы увидеть свою страницу на Доске Почета.

Голосуя за это уведомление, вы помогаете всем пользователям Голоса. Узнайте, как здесь.