The markers of the rating of personal evaluation of ICO in my reviews.

Hi, crypto-guys! Om-nom-nom. I participate in bounty campaigns and invest in various ICO. And now I came to the conclusion that I need to enter my personal rating score, which I will mark projects in articles. Because some projects are very successful and profitable for bounty hunters, but not so profitable for investors. Conversely, very often large-scale projects with a high level of fame, give a good profit to investors, but because of a small pool of rewards or a large number of hunters bring them a small profit. Competition in the industry is getting stronger every day. So:

• BH
  (bounty hunter) a low threshold for participation in the campaign of generosity. The project will be of interest to bounty hunters , collectors of airdrops.
• BH+
  (bounty hunter+) possible good profit is for bounty hunters
• I+
  (interest+) the project is interesting for participation
• I++
  (interest++) the project very interesting for participation
• I+++
  (interest+++) the project is very very interesting for participation
• ICH
  (interest cyber hamster) I participate in the project itself or plan to participate, or I really want to get into the project (sometimes I don’t have time to pass KYC, yet hamsters like not only to eat but also to sleep).

Disclaimer: Evaluation expresses my personal opinion and is not recommendation make investment decisions. This analysis is based on open public information and contains conclusions and information relevant to the date of the report.